What is the difference between tx.origin and msg.sender in the context of cryptocurrency?

3 answers

• tham vFeb 24, 2024 · a year ago
  In cryptocurrency, tx.origin refers to the original sender of a transaction, while msg.sender refers to the immediate sender of the transaction. This means that tx.origin represents the address that initiated the transaction, even if it was called by another contract. On the other hand, msg.sender represents the address of the contract or account that directly called the current function. So, while tx.origin remains constant throughout the entire transaction, msg.sender can change depending on the contract or account that interacts with the smart contract.
  562

  281
• Lucky AkemokheJun 12, 2020 · 5 years ago
  When it comes to cryptocurrency, tx.origin and msg.sender serve different purposes. Tx.origin represents the original sender of the transaction, regardless of any intermediate contracts involved. On the other hand, msg.sender represents the immediate sender of the transaction, which can be a contract or an externally owned account. Understanding the difference between these two is crucial for ensuring the security and integrity of smart contracts and transactions in the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
  500

  167
• Re solutionsDec 13, 2021 · 4 years ago
  In the context of cryptocurrency, tx.origin and msg.sender have distinct roles. Tx.origin refers to the original sender of the transaction, even if it was initiated by another contract. On the other hand, msg.sender represents the immediate sender of the transaction, which can be a contract or an externally owned account. This differentiation is important for maintaining the integrity and security of smart contracts, as it allows developers to track the origin of a transaction and ensure that the appropriate actions are taken based on the sender's identity.
  563

  141